SFDR and SDR: Two paths diverging on sustainable finance?
Financial institutions operating across both regions must now contend with two parallel regulatory regimes
Financial institutions operating across both regions must now contend with two parallel regulatory regimes
Supporting European fund managers and ESG analysts navigate regulatory and labelling requirements
A further 30-50% of all European ESG funds are expected to change their names in line with FCA and ESMA marketing guidelines in 2025
The UK is also bringing forward ESG ratings regulation
GSS bond issuance has experienced its most active period since the market’s inception
EFAMA says that clarification is urgently needed to enable, rather than restrict, EU sustainable investment
Bioy would like to see less traditional asset classes made more accessible to investors
Following ESMA’s announcement on fund names, ESG managers will be assessing the impact on their portfolios, writes Hortense Bioy
A Clarity AI study has found Article 8 funds are most affected by the ESMA naming rules
Sustainable investment commentators criticise adjustments to thresholds
New rules to authorise ESG ratings, improve transparency and avoid conflict of interest
Fund labels, disclosure requirements and sustainable definitions all under the consultation microscope